FTC Opens Antitrust Investigation Into Microsoft’s Cloud, AI, and Cybersecurity Practices
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched a comprehensive antitrust investigation into Microsoft, focusing on its cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and cybersecurity practices. The inquiry, approved by FTC Chair Lina Khan, targets alleged anticompetitive behaviors, particularly in Microsoft’s software licensing and bundling strategies. This marks another significant regulatory challenge for Microsoft, following similar scrutiny in the UK and the EU.
Key Focus Areas of the Investigation
- Software Licensing and Cloud Bundling:
- Microsoft is accused of using restrictive licensing agreements that compel customers to adopt its Azure cloud platform. These practices allegedly create hurdles for clients seeking to switch to competitors, leveraging the dominance of Windows Server and Office products
- AI and Cybersecurity Services:
- The FTC is also exploring Microsoft’s conduct in AI and cybersecurity, areas where the company has been aggressively expanding. The agency aims to assess whether Microsoft’s dominance in these fields limits innovation or market competition
- Government Contracts:
- Concerns have been raised about Microsoft’s influence due to its substantial government contracts, which may amplify its market power
Broader Implications and Political Context
The timing of the investigation is notable, coinciding with a transition in U.S. leadership. Critics suggest this could influence the investigation’s trajectory, as incoming Republican leadership may adopt a less aggressive stance toward corporate regulation
Microsoft has faced similar allegations in Europe, where it recently settled a complaint regarding its licensing policies, agreeing to make pricing changes and pay fines. These precedents could inform the FTC’s approach
This investigation underscores growing regulatory attention to Big Tech’s practices, signaling potential shifts in how cloud computing and AI markets are governed. Whether the FTC’s actions will result in significant policy changes remains uncertain, particularly with political dynamics at play.